Many modern general-purpose computer processors have some provisions for SIMD, in the form of a group of registers and instructions to make use of them. SWAR refers to the use of those registers and instructions, as opposed to using specialized processing engines designed to be better at SIMD operations. It also refers to the use of SIMD with general-purpose registers and instructions that were not meant to do it at the time, by way of various novel software tricks.
A SWAR architecture is one which includes instructions explicitly intended to perform parallel operations across data that is stored in the independent subwords or fields of a register. A SWAR-capable architecture is one which includes a set of instructions that is sufficient to allow data stored in these fields to be treated independently even though the architecture does not include instructions that are explicitly intended for that purpose. An early example of a SWAR architecture was the Intel Pentium with MMX, which implemented the MMX extension set. The Intel Pentium, by contrast, did not include such instructions, but could still act as a SWAR architecture through careful hand-coding or compiler techniques.
With the introduction of Intel's MMX multimedia instruction set extensions in 1996, desktop processors with SIMD parallel processing capabilities became common. Early on, these instructions could only be used via hand-written assembly code.
In the fall of 1996, Professor Hank Dietz was the instructor for the undergraduate Compiler Construction course at Purdue University's School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. For this course, he assigned a series of projects in which the students would build a simple compiler targeting MMX. The input language was a subset dialect of MasPar's MPL called NEMPL (Not Exactly MPL).
During the course of the semester, it became clear to the course teaching assistant, Randall (Randy) Fisher, that there were a number of issues with MMX that would make it difficult to build the back-end of the NEMPL compiler. For example, MMX has an instruction for multiplying 16-bit data but not multiplying 8-bit data. The NEMPL language did not account for this problem, allowing the programmer to write programs that required 8-bit multiplies.
Intel's x86 architecture was not the only architecture to include SIMD-like parallel instructions. Sun's VIS, SGI's MDMX, and other multimedia instruction sets had been added to other manufacturers' existing instruction set architectures to support so-called new media applications. These extensions had significant differences in the precision of data and types of instructions supported.
Dietz and Fisher began developing the idea of a well-defined parallel programming model that would allow the programming to target the model without knowing the specifics of the target architecture. This model would become the basis of Fisher's dissertation. The acronym "SWAR" was coined by Dietz and Fisher one day in Hank's office in the MSEE building at Purdue University. It refers to this form of parallel processing, architectures which are designed to natively perform this type of processing, and the general-purpose programming model that is Fisher's dissertation.
The problem of compiling for these widely varying architectures was discussed in a paper presented at LCPC98.